Gavin Newsom SPIRALS LIVE ON AIR When he Realizes Trump Is ACTUALLY Right…

NEW YORK — Governor Gavin Newsom of California has ignited renewed debate within the Democratic Party after acknowledging failures on border enforcement and defending California’s expansion of health care coverage to undocumented immigrants, remarks that critics say could complicate the party’s national strategy ahead of the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential race.

In a wide-ranging interview with Ezra Klein, a New York Times columnist, Mr. Newsom offered a candid assessment of Democratic governance during the Biden years, arguing that the party had failed to confront political realities on immigration and border security. His comments stood out not only for their substance but for their timing, as speculation grows about his potential candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028.

“We failed on the border,” Mr. Newsom said, referring both to California’s experience and to the broader national response. He pointed to mass migration through the state and acknowledged that Democrats had not sufficiently “owned up to” the consequences of their policies. While he emphasized respect for the Biden administration, Mr. Newsom conceded that the scale of migration had overwhelmed state and local governments.

The admission marked a notable shift in tone for a Democratic leader long associated with progressive immigration policies. It also echoed critiques frequently leveled by Republicans, including former President Donald J. Trump, who has argued that Democratic governance enabled disorder at the border.

At the same time, Mr. Newsom forcefully defended California’s decision to extend health care coverage to undocumented immigrants, framing it as a moral commitment rather than a political calculation. “I’m proud of that,” he said, describing the policy as part of his broader belief in universal health care. California, he noted, became the first state to offer coverage regardless of immigration status, a promise he said he had campaigned on repeatedly.

That dual posture — acknowledging failure on border enforcement while affirming expansive social benefits — underscored what Mr. Klein described as the governor’s “contradictions,” a theme that ran throughout the interview. Mr. Newsom appeared to argue that border control and humanitarian policy need not be mutually exclusive, though critics contend that the policies are inseparable in practice.

The remarks have drawn scrutiny because they appear to validate claims that Democrats have often rejected. Republican leaders have repeatedly accused Democratic states of using taxpayer funds to support undocumented immigrants, an assertion Democrats have typically disputed at the federal level. Mr. Newsom’s comments, while focused on state policy, have reopened questions about the scope and funding of such programs.

According to California budget analysts, Medi-Cal — the state’s Medicaid program — is the largest item in the state budget, costing nearly $200 billion annually when federal and state funds are combined. More than half of that funding comes from the federal government, meaning national taxpayers indirectly support California’s health care expansion.

Mr. Newsom also reflected on how Democratic opposition to Mr. Trump shaped policy decisions during and after his presidency. He suggested that Democrats overcorrected in response to what they viewed as executive overreach under Mr. Trump, moving “180 degrees in the opposite direction” on issues like immigration enforcement.

That reaction, he argued, contributed to the surge in migration that followed the pandemic, alongside global economic disruptions and supply chain shocks. He added that Democrats underestimated the political consequences of those decisions, particularly after outperforming expectations in the midterm elections.

“We picked up the wrong lessons,” Mr. Newsom said, suggesting that electoral success lulled Democrats into avoiding difficult debates rather than addressing voter concerns directly.

The interview arrives as Mr. Newsom is increasingly viewed as a leading figure in the Democratic Party’s future. Betting markets and political analysts have consistently placed him among the top contenders for the 2028 nomination, ahead of figures such as Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania.

But his national profile has also brought heightened scrutiny of his record and messaging. Mr. Newsom has been outspoken on cultural issues, including LGBTQ rights, and has acknowledged that some of those positions are unpopular with broad segments of the electorate. “Eighty percent of the people listening disagree with my position,” he said of transgender-related policies, even as he defended his legislative record.

For Democrats, the interview underscored a larger dilemma: how to reconcile progressive policy commitments with voter concerns over border security, public spending and social change. Mr. Newsom’s willingness to acknowledge mistakes may appeal to some voters seeking candor, but it also risks providing ammunition to political opponents.

As the party looks toward the next election cycle, Mr. Newsom’s remarks reflect an ongoing struggle to define a coherent governing philosophy — one that balances accountability with ideology, and national ambition with political reality. Whether that balance strengthens or weakens Democratic prospects remains an open question.