U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ignited a political firestorm by alleging that the Obama Foundation, led by former President Barack Obama, is embroiled in a scandal involving millions of dollars in missing funds. In a July 8 statement to Fox News, Rubio claimed that a State Department review of nonprofit financial records uncovered “irregularities” in the foundation’s accounts, suggesting potential mismanagement or misappropriation of donations intended for community programs. The explosive accusations have drawn fierce pushback from Obama allies, who call them baseless, while sparking intense debate on X and beyond.

Rubio, speaking on Hannity, said the review stemmed from his oversight of foreign aid and nonprofit transparency, a priority since he assumed multiple roles, including acting archivist of the National Archives, under President Donald Trump. He alleged that the Obama Foundation, established in 2014 to fund civic initiatives like the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago, failed to account for “tens of millions” in donations from 2018 to 2023. “This isn’t pocket change—it’s money meant for communities that’s vanished,” Rubio said, citing discrepancies in IRS filings. He called for a DOJ investigation, claiming the findings mirror past financial controversies from his time as Florida House Speaker, where he faced scrutiny over party funds, per The Guardian.

The Obama Foundation, valued at over $1 billion in assets, has been a cornerstone of Obama’s post-presidency, funding youth leadership and civic engagement programs. A foundation spokesperson, quoted by CNN, dismissed Rubio’s claims as “politically motivated fiction,” noting that independent audits by PricewaterhouseCoopers show no irregularities. Former President Obama, in a rare public response on X, called the allegations “a distraction from the Trump administration’s failures,” pointing to the dismantling of USAID, which critics like The Lancet estimate could lead to 14 million deaths by 2030. Obama urged supporters to “focus on facts, not conspiracies.”

The allegations come amid heightened scrutiny of Rubio’s own financial history. As Florida House Speaker from 2007 to 2009, Rubio faced accusations of misusing conservative action committee funds for personal expenses, though he was never charged, per The Guardian. Critics, including Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.), accused Rubio of hypocrisy, noting his role in cutting USAID programs while questioning nonprofit transparency, per The New York Times. Sherman, who challenged Rubio on USAID-related deaths, called the foundation allegations “a political stunt to deflect from real issues.”

On X, reactions are polarized. Supporters of Rubio, like @PatriotVoice22, hailed him for “exposing Obama’s corruption,” while others, like @BlueWave2025, labeled it a “smear campaign” with “zero evidence.” The lack of concrete details in Rubio’s claims has fueled skepticism, with PolitiFact noting that no public IRS records corroborate the alleged discrepancies. However, Rubio’s reference to a 2016 Politico report on his own campaign’s “dark money” nonprofit, Conservative Solutions Project, which raised $15.8 million anonymously, has drawn parallels, with critics questioning his credibility on financial transparency.

The controversy has reignited debates over political nonprofits. The Obama Foundation’s high-profile donors, including corporate giants like Microsoft, have faced scrutiny before, but no prior allegations of missing funds have surfaced, per The Washington Post. Rubio’s call for a DOJ probe, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, has raised concerns about politicization, given Bondi’s defense of Trump’s Epstein-related decisions, per The New Republic. Meanwhile, former presidents George W. Bush and Obama have publicly criticized USAID’s closure, with Obama calling it “a colossal mistake”.

As the story unfolds, Rubio’s allegations remain unverified, with the State Department promising a detailed report “soon.” The Obama Foundation has invited independent audits to clear its name, while Democrats accuse Rubio of weaponizing his role to settle political scores. With no hard evidence yet disclosed, the scandal has divided public opinion, leaving Americans to parse truth from rhetoric in a heated political climate.