As Americans rang in the New Year, an unsettling quiet settled over dozens of U.S. border cities that once relied on Canadian visitors to fuel their busiest season. From Washington State to Maine, hotels that historically sold out months in advance reported rows of empty rooms. Restaurants shortened hours. Reservations vanished. What should have been a peak tourism moment instead exposed a deeper crisis that has been building quietly throughout 2025.

Business owners across northern border towns delivered a blunt assessment to U.S. media: without Canadian visitors, many of these communities simply do not survive. For decades, local economies were structured around predictable waves of Canadian tourists arriving for holidays, shopping trips, sporting events, and seasonal celebrations. That assumption has now collapsed. The New Year boycott did not appear suddenly; it marked the visible culmination of a year-long behavioral shift that policymakers in Washington underestimated.
According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data, land crossings from Canada into the United States declined by approximately 19 percent during the first ten months of 2025 compared to the previous year, representing roughly 4.5 million fewer crossings. The decline was even sharper in specific regions. Vermont reported a 28 percent drop in Canadian crossings. Washington State saw passenger vehicle traffic fall by about 24 percent. New Hampshire experienced declines near 30 percent, while Montana recorded drops approaching 19 percent. These are not marginal fluctuations. They are structural breaks in travel behavior.

The economic consequences are already measurable. A December 2025 congressional report by the Joint Economic Committee documented significant losses across 11 U.S. border states. In Montana, Canadians accounted for nearly 80 percent of international visitors in 2024, contributing roughly $170 million to the state economy. By 2025, businesses reported a 44 percent decline in Canadian credit card spending. In New Hampshire, state-run campground reservations fell more than 70 percent during the first five months of the year. Hotels in towns like North Conway reported empty rooms during weekends that historically reached full capacity.
Washington State provides one of the starkest examples. In cities such as Spokane, local tourism officials reported visitor declines exceeding 30 percent. Duty-free shop operators at the border described revenue collapses of more than 80 percent, forcing layoffs and reduced operating hours. Similar patterns emerged in Michigan, Maine, and Minnesota, where communities built around cross-border tourism began confronting the prospect of long-term contraction rather than a temporary downturn.

What makes this boycott different from past diplomatic disputes is its durability. Surveys conducted throughout 2025 show that Canadian reluctance to travel to the United States has hardened into normalized behavior. Early polling indicated nearly half of Canadians had canceled or reconsidered U.S. travel plans. By midyear, that number rose above 50 percent among those who had previously intended to visit. By October, Statistics Canada reported a 30.5 percent decline in return trips by car from the United States compared to the previous year, signaling that the shift was persisting rather than fading.
The causes are layered. Political rhetoric, trade tensions, and repeated comments questioning Canadian sovereignty played a central role in triggering the initial reaction. Subsequent tariff escalations and the breakdown of trade talks reinforced the perception among Canadians that the bilateral relationship had become unstable and dismissive. Border enforcement changes further compounded the issue. New registration requirements, biometric data collection, additional fees, longer wait times, and heightened questioning have made U.S. travel more time-consuming and intrusive, particularly for older Canadians who historically formed a high-value travel segment known as “snowbirds.”
At the same time, Canadian travelers did not stop traveling altogether. Instead, they redirected spending. International destinations such as Europe, Japan, Mexico, and the Caribbean saw increased Canadian bookings. Domestic tourism within Canada surged as provincial governments expanded marketing budgets to capture travelers who previously crossed the U.S. border. For many Canadians, alternative destinations now offer fewer political frictions and a stronger sense of welcome.
For U.S. border cities, the New Year boycott served as a warning signal rather than an endpoint. Tourism economists estimate that each percentage-point decline in Canadian travel represents roughly $200 million in lost economic activity. With declines nearing 20 percent nationally and far higher in certain regions, losses could reach into the billions, with long-term implications for employment, municipal budgets, and regional stability.
Perhaps most concerning for local leaders is the realization that this shift may not reverse quickly, even if political conditions change. Travel habits, once broken, do not automatically reset. Families that discovered alternatives to traditional U.S. trips may not return. Communities that once depended on cross-border movement now face the challenge of reinventing economies built on assumptions that no longer hold. The empty hotels and silent streets of New Year’s Eve were not an anomaly. They were a signal of a deeper realignment still unfolding.