Washington, D.C. — October 27, 2025
A new firestorm has erupted in Washington after Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) introduced a controversial bill that would ban all dual citizens from serving in the U.S. Congress, igniting fierce national debate over patriotism, loyalty, and what it truly means to be American.

In a statement that instantly went viral, Luna declared, “The ONLY people who should be allowed to serve in Congress are American citizens. If you want to write America’s laws, your loyalty must be to America alone — not to another flag, not to another country.”

The bold declaration drew applause from her supporters and outrage from critics, turning Luna — already a rising conservative firebrand — into the most talked-about figure in Congress this week.

A Push to Redefine Loyalty

Luna’s proposed legislation, titled the “American Sovereignty Protection Act,” seeks to bar anyone holding dual citizenship from serving in either chamber of Congress. The bill would require all candidates and sitting members to prove they hold exclusive U.S. citizenship, potentially forcing some lawmakers to renounce foreign ties or resign.

Her office claims the measure is about “protecting national integrity,” citing rising concerns about global influence and security vulnerabilities within government. “We have to ensure that every lawmaker represents the United States — and only the United States,” Luna told reporters outside the Capitol.

The move comes amid renewed scrutiny over foreign influence in American politics, from campaign donations to business interests abroad. Luna’s proposal, while unprecedented in recent decades, echoes historical concerns about “dual loyalty” — a term that has long fueled tension in U.S. political discourse.

Outrage Across Party Lines

Reactions to the bill were immediate and explosive. Prominent Democrats denounced it as “xenophobic grandstanding” designed to divide Americans, while some moderate Republicans expressed quiet discomfort about its implications.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) blasted Luna’s bill on X (formerly Twitter), writing, “This is not about patriotism. It’s about fear. Millions of Americans have dual heritage — that doesn’t make them less American.”

However, Luna’s base of supporters — including many in the MAGA and America First movements — rallied behind her message. Hashtags like #OnlyAmericansInCongress and #LunaLoyaltyBill began trending within hours, with thousands praising her as “the only one brave enough to say what everyone’s thinking.”

Political analysts say Luna’s move may signal a broader strategy to position herself as one of the GOP’s boldest voices ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Supporters: “She’s Standing Up for America”

For Luna’s supporters, the proposal is a breath of fresh air in an era they believe has blurred the line between national and global interests. “She’s not afraid to put America first — period,” said Mark Davison, a Florida veteran and longtime GOP donor. “If you’re going to serve this country, your allegiance should be absolute.”

Others have drawn parallels between Luna’s stance and the Trump-era populist movement that emphasized border control, economic nationalism, and cultural identity. Conservative commentator Tomi Lahren praised Luna on her show, calling her “a warrior for American purity in a time of global confusion.”

Still, not everyone on the right is fully on board. Some libertarian-leaning Republicans warned the bill could alienate immigrant communities who already feel marginalized. “You can’t preach freedom and then punish people for their heritage,” said one GOP strategist.

Critics Warn of Dangerous Precedent

Civil rights groups and constitutional scholars are raising red flags, arguing that the bill undermines the principles of equality and inclusion.

Dr. Elaine Rodriguez, a political science professor at Georgetown University, said, “This kind of legislation flirts with nativism. America has always been a nation of immigrants. Many lawmakers — past and present — have held dual ties and still served honorably.”

Critics also note that Luna’s bill could face major constitutional hurdles, as citizenship requirements for members of Congress are defined in the U.S. Constitution itself. Any attempt to add restrictions would likely face intense legal scrutiny and potential challenges in federal court.

A Political Firestorm That’s Just Beginning

Regardless of the bill’s chances of success, Luna’s move has clearly struck a nerve. The controversy has flooded social media with heated debates over loyalty, nationalism, and American identity.

Some see Luna’s bill as a genuine call to strengthen national unity; others view it as a calculated play for attention in an increasingly polarized political landscape.

As one analyst put it, “Luna knows exactly what she’s doing — she’s staking out the populist lane, and the outrage only fuels her rise.”

Whether her bill passes or not, one thing is certain: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna has once again proven she’s unafraid to challenge Washington’s status quo — and she’s ready to make every American pick a side.