America Shocked: Former President Obama Proposed to Be Prosecuted for Treason – Trump Immediately Takes a Stormy Action!

On July 18, 2025, the United States was rocked by a bombshell accusation from Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard, who called for the prosecution of former President Barack Obama and senior officials from his administration for an alleged “treasonous conspiracy” to undermine Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory. Gabbard’s 114-page report, released with declassified documents, claims Obama and his team manufactured intelligence to falsely implicate Russia in election interference, setting the stage for a “years-long coup” against Trump. The allegations, amplified by Trump’s immediate and fiery response, including a viral AI-generated video of Obama’s arrest, have ignited a firestorm of controversy, polarizing the nation and raising questions about the integrity of the 2016 election.

Gabbard’s report, dubbed the “Russia Hoax,” asserts that Obama, along with former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey, former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, and others, orchestrated a deliberate effort to discredit Trump’s 2016 win over Hillary Clinton. The documents, handed over to the Department of Justice for potential criminal referrals, include emails and memos from late 2016. A key piece of evidence is a December 7, 2016, memo prepared for Clapper, stating, “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.” Yet, after a December 9 National Security Council meeting, a new assessment—allegedly relying on the discredited Steele dossier—claimed Russia sought to sway the election for Trump.

Gabbard declared, “The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup.” She argued that this manipulation violated the Constitution and threatened democracy, urging that “every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.” Her appearance on Fox & Friends on July 19, 2025, doubled down on these claims, naming Obama directly and fueling public outrage.

President Trump wasted no time capitalizing on Gabbard’s allegations. On July 20, 2025, he posted an AI-generated video on Truth Social depicting Obama being arrested by FBI agents in the Oval Office, a provocative move that went viral, garnering millions of views. Trump captioned the post, “Great job by DNI Gabbard exposing the Russia Hoax! Time for accountability!” The video, condemned by Democrats as “dangerous propaganda,” followed Trump’s earlier praise for White House spokesman Harrison Fields, who accused Obama of orchestrating the “most corrupt presidency” on Fox News. Trump’s endorsement of prosecutions, including his call to target “thugs” like Brennan and Comey, intensified the rhetoric.

The timing of Trump’s actions raised suspicions, as the allegations coincided with scrutiny over his administration’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related files. Critics, including Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), suggested the video and accusations were a distraction, noting, “This is about changing the subject from Epstein.” Nonetheless, Trump’s base rallied, with hashtags like #ArrestObama trending on X, reflecting sentiment that the Russia probe was a “witch hunt” designed to undermine his presidency.

Democrats swiftly denounced Gabbard’s report as politically motivated and baseless. Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, called the accusations “utter nonsense,” citing the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee’s 2020 report, which confirmed Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) criticized Gabbard for “weaponizing” her position, pointing to her reluctance to label leaker Edward Snowden a traitor while branding Obama officials as treasonous. The legal definition of treason, per the U.S. Constitution, requires levying war or aiding enemies, a high bar that legal experts like Gregory Magarian argue Gabbard’s claims do not meet.

The Steele dossier, central to Gabbard’s allegations, has long been controversial. Compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele, it alleged ties between Trump and Russia but was later criticized for unverified claims. While it informed early FBI investigations, the Mueller report found no evidence of Trump campaign collusion with Russia, though it confirmed Russian influence operations. Gabbard’s claim that Obama officials knowingly used the dossier to mislead the public contradicts prior intelligence assessments, which found no political bias in the FBI’s actions.

The allegations have polarized public sentiment. On X, Trump supporters celebrated Gabbard’s report, with one user writing, “Finally, Obama’s corruption is exposed!” Others expressed skepticism, noting the lack of new evidence overturning years of investigations. Whistleblowers from the intelligence community reportedly came forward, claiming disgust at the alleged manipulation, though their accounts remain unverified. The Justice Department has not confirmed whether it will pursue Gabbard’s referrals, but CNN reported that Brennan and Comey are already under investigation for unrelated matters, adding to the controversy.

The accusations raise profound questions about the politicization of intelligence and trust in democratic institutions. If substantiated, they could erode public faith in government, but without concrete evidence, they risk being dismissed as partisan revisionism. Trump’s history of alleging treason—dating back to 2018 claims of Obama spying on his campaign—further complicates the narrative, as no prior accusations led to charges. Legal scholars warn that prosecuting a former president for treason would require extraordinary evidence, unlikely to emerge from declassified memos alone.

Gabbard’s call for Obama’s prosecution, coupled with Trump’s provocative video, has thrust the 2016 election back into the spotlight. The allegations, while gripping, face significant hurdles in proving treason, a charge rarely prosecuted in U.S. history. As the Justice Department reviews Gabbard’s documents, the nation watches closely, torn between demands for accountability and warnings of political overreach. The stormy actions of Trump and his allies may galvanize their base, but they risk deepening divisions in an already polarized America, leaving the future of this controversy uncertain.