Facebook Pulls the Plug on Anti-ICE Harassment Page After DOJ Pressure

In a swift crackdown on online threats, Facebook has removed a notorious group page identified by the U.S. Justice Department as a hub for doxxing and harassing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Chicago. The action, announced on October 14, 2025, by Attorney General Pam Bondi, underscores the escalating tensions in President Donald Trump’s aggressive deportation campaign, where digital vigilantism has spilled into real-world dangers for federal officers.

The page in question, reportedly a large Facebook group with thousands of members, was allegedly used to share personal information—such as home addresses, vehicle details, and patrol schedules—of ICE agents stationed in the Windy City. Dubbed “ICE Sighting-Chicagoland” by local media, it served as a digital early-warning system for undocumented immigrants, posting real-time alerts about agent sightings near schools, grocery stores, and community centers. What started as a community tool for evasion quickly devolved into coordinated harassment, with users inciting protests, vandalism, and direct confrontations. Bondi highlighted this in her X post: “The wave of violence against ICE has been driven by online apps and social media campaigns designed to put ICE officers at risk.” The DOJ’s “outreach” to Meta—Facebook’s parent company—led to the page’s immediate takedown for “violating our policies against coordinated harm,” a Meta spokesperson confirmed.

This isn’t an isolated incident. Since Trump’s January 20, 2025, inauguration, ICE operations have intensified under “Operation Midway Blitz,” deploying over 200 agents to Chicago for mass deportations targeting an estimated 400,000 undocumented residents. The city, a sanctuary haven under Democratic Mayor Brandon Johnson and Governor JB Pritzker, has pushed back hard. Johnson recently signed an executive order barring ICE from using city property for staging raids, while local businesses plastered “No ICE Allowed” signs in windows. Protests have turned volatile, with reports of agents being pelted with bottles, doxxed on social media, and even receiving death threats. The White House claims a “more than 1,000 percent increase in attacks” on ICE personnel since January, though NPR notes a lack of public evidence for such a dramatic spike.

The removal follows a pattern of tech crackdowns. Earlier this month, Apple yanked the “ICEBlock” app, which allowed users to geotrack agents’ movements, after Trump administration pressure. Google followed suit, delisting similar tools. The DOJ has vowed prosecutions against app developers, framing these platforms as enablers of “extremism.” Bondi emphasized collaboration: “We will continue engaging tech companies to eliminate platforms where radicals can incite imminent violence against federal law enforcement.” Critics, however, decry it as censorship. Immigrant rights groups like the ACLU argue the page was a vital resource for vulnerable communities, not a call to violence. “Doxxing is wrong, but tracking public agents in public spaces isn’t harassment—it’s accountability,” ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt told Reuters. Chicago’s progressive activists, including the Chicago Teachers Union, rallied outside federal buildings, chanting “Hands off our neighbors!” They warn that silencing these tools could lead to unchecked raids, infringing on due process and free speech.

Social media erupted with divided reactions. On X, conservative voices cheered: “Finally, holding Big Tech accountable for protecting our heroes in blue,” tweeted @VinceGalilei, garnering 15,000 likes. Left-leaning users fired back: “This is the new McCarthyism—stifling dissent against a deportation machine that’s tearing families apart,” posted @ScotsFyre. Hashtags like #ProtectICE and #SanctuaryCity surged, with memes juxtaposing Bondi’s stern face against hooded protesters. Family members of ICE agents shared anonymous stories of fear: one agent’s spouse recounted harassing calls traced to the now-deleted page, forcing them into hiding.

The broader implications ripple through Trump’s immigration crackdown. With deportations hitting 500,000 in the first nine months—up 40% from 2024—resistance has gone digital. Apps like “Notifica” and Telegram channels have popped up as alternatives, vowing to evade takedowns. Tech experts predict a cat-and-mouse game, with Meta’s algorithms now under federal scrutiny. Zuckerberg, who ended third-party fact-checking in December 2024 amid “political censorship” complaints, faces renewed heat: Is this voluntary compliance or coerced moderation?

As Chicago braces for more raids, this takedown marks a flashpoint in the immigration wars. Bondi’s DOJ signals zero tolerance for online threats, but advocates fear it chills activism. In a city where 20% of residents are immigrants, the line between vigilance and vigilantism blurs. Will this curb violence, or fuel underground networks? One thing’s certain: in the digital age, the battle for borders is as much about bytes as barriers. As Bondi warned, “The fight against extremism starts online.” But for those on the front lines—agents and activists alike—the real peril is offline.